Page 29 of 35

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:54 am
by Middle Kingdom
When my unlce and I go FG kicking at
the local high scholl, he does it straight on,
saying he's Mosely.

It's pretty funny, but he nailed a 40 yarder one day.

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 10:39 am
by CygnusX1
I'll never forget the 50-plus yarder he nailed against the Giants
in the snow in the NFC Championship....



ahhh the glory days....

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 7:35 am
by YYZ30
Question for the day:

If Matt Walsh (Pats video tape person) produces a tape of the Rams walkthrough the day before the Super Bowl- do the Colts need another fan? 8)

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 7:44 am
by Soup4Rush
come on over Z.. glad to have ya on board.. :-D

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:18 am
by CygnusX1
Well, Spags is out as new coach of the 'skins.

Hate to say it Soups, but I think the fans here want Meeks.

I think Snyder wants Fossel....

I think I want to MOVE to Indy. :-D

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:29 am
by Walkinghairball
I hear Seattle is getting Mora after next season when Holmgren FINALLY goes back to Cheese land or where the hell ever he goes. :-D

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:12 am
by Soup4Rush
cmon over Sigs.. I may be looking for a room mate in the very near future.

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:27 am
by Middle Kingdom
YYZ30 wrote:Question for the day:

If Matt Walsh (Pats video tape person) produces a tape of the Rams walkthrough the day before the Super Bowl- do the Colts need another fan? 8)
As bad as that would be, the Pats head honchos would deny that
it was watched, or that they had Walsh do it.
They'd hang it on him, saying he did it on his own, we knew nothing about it.......blah blah.

Besides, the Rams never got to the red zone to run their plays,
and when they did, they scored two TD's.

Still it paints a bad picture.

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:41 am
by CygnusX1
Soup4Rush wrote:cmon over Sigs.. I may be looking for a room mate in the very near future.
If'n I screw up one more time with Sigette I'll prolly take ya up on it Brudda. :roll: :-D

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:16 am
by YYZ30
Middle Kingdom wrote:
YYZ30 wrote:Question for the day:

If Matt Walsh (Pats video tape person) produces a tape of the Rams walkthrough the day before the Super Bowl- do the Colts need another fan? 8)
As bad as that would be, the Pats head honchos would deny that
it was watched, or that they had Walsh do it.
They'd hang it on him, saying he did it on his own, we knew nothing about it.......blah blah.

Besides, the Rams never got to the red zone to run their plays,
and when they did, they scored two TD's.

Still it paints a bad picture.
The evidence at that point would be pretty damning, and with Goddell telling Matt Walsh he will indemnify him, IF this tape does surface, I will be burning all my Patriots gear.

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:50 am
by CygnusX1
YYZ30 wrote:
Middle Kingdom wrote:
YYZ30 wrote:Question for the day:

If Matt Walsh (Pats video tape person) produces a tape of the Rams walkthrough the day before the Super Bowl- do the Colts need another fan? 8)
As bad as that would be, the Pats head honchos would deny that
it was watched, or that they had Walsh do it.
They'd hang it on him, saying he did it on his own, we knew nothing about it.......blah blah.

Besides, the Rams never got to the red zone to run their plays,
and when they did, they scored two TD's.

Still it paints a bad picture.
The evidence at that point would be pretty damning, and with Goddell telling Matt Walsh he will indemnify him, IF this tape does surface, I will be burning all my Patriots gear.
Somebody PM me and make me smart about this...What are you talking aboooot? hel-lowwwwwwww CanaDUH

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:57 am
by Soup4Rush
I still don't see where they gained an advantage with the tapes. You still have to make the plays..

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:07 am
by YYZ30
Soup4Rush wrote:I still don't see where they gained an advantage with the tapes. You still have to make the plays..
But still, if I knew formations the night before the Super Bowl, I could sure as hell sit up for 2-3 hours and come up with a supplement for the playbook for those situations and make a defensive scheme up that would make the Rams go "Wha...?" when their offense lined up in those situations....

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:17 am
by Soup4Rush
from a history standpoint, I would rather believe the Pats won all those games because they were good, not because they cheated. I still don't think they gained that much of an advantage, but who knows right? They did not vid anybody this year and managed to win 18 games.

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:26 am
by CygnusX1
why would they be running plays in the open...before the game
...so they COULD be taped?

what happened to closed practices?

call me crazy, but maybe I'm missing something here... :roll: :???: