Page 20 of 35

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:34 am
by Sir Myghin
ElfDude wrote:Nine Bowls of Soup!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHPJSmvkJZo
That is one of the weirdest things I have ever heard Elf, and that says quite a bit

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:36 am
by CygnusX1
***wonders why YT is such a "threat" and forbidden here*** :roll: :cry:

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:44 am
by YYZ30
CygnusX1 wrote:***wonders why YT is such a "threat" and forbidden here*** :roll: :cry:
The summit gathers more than 800 scholars and security experts as they discuss emerging threats and their possible countermeasures. Naturally, as we see an evolution toward more sophisticated anti-spam techniques, spammers attack with evermore sneaky techniques of their own to deliver malicious messages. Among some of the clever ways hackers hide their codes are embedding them in images or disguising them as PDF files.

The article says there have been ?a few? cases of video-related hacking so far, including a worm that launches a corrupt website after a user opens a media file in a player, and another that silently installs spyware when a video file is opened. Spreading fake video links that contain worms and viruses have been attempted using YouTube.

The article goes on to say that hackers are exploiting social networking sites, which by their very nature rely on ?viral? spread via users who want to share information.
The worm would be enough for your IT to slamdunk YT.

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:49 am
by CygnusX1
YYZ30 wrote:
CygnusX1 wrote:***wonders why YT is such a "threat" and forbidden here*** :roll: :cry:
The summit gathers more than 800 scholars and security experts as they discuss emerging threats and their possible countermeasures. Naturally, as we see an evolution toward more sophisticated anti-spam techniques, spammers attack with evermore sneaky techniques of their own to deliver malicious messages. Among some of the clever ways hackers hide their codes are embedding them in images or disguising them as PDF files.

The article says there have been ?a few? cases of video-related hacking so far, including a worm that launches a corrupt website after a user opens a media file in a player, and another that silently installs spyware when a video file is opened. Spreading fake video links that contain worms and viruses have been attempted using YouTube.

The article goes on to say that hackers are exploiting social networking sites, which by their very nature rely on ?viral? spread via users who want to share information.
The worm would be enough for your IT to slamdunk YT.
Thanks Zed. I knew there was hacking, but I thought the good guys figured it out by now....

***Gratefully avoids YT for the duration***

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:22 pm
by ElfDude
Big Blue Owl wrote:If the Doors played Stairway To Heaven

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW8jVHTC ... re=related
Definitely a testament to how much better The Beatles were than The Doors

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:50 pm
by Big Blue Owl
ElfDude wrote:
Big Blue Owl wrote:If the Doors played Stairway To Heaven

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW8jVHTC ... re=related
Definitely a testament to how much better The Beatles were than The Doors
The difference may be the introduction to drugs. When the Beatles had this original hit of theirs that was used as the backdrop music for this tune, they hadn't been introduced to the width and breadth of the drug culture that The Doors had by the time their "used for Stairway" song was written. That may (and may not) explain the "betterness" of the Beatles version than the Doors version, but whatever the actual truth, I agree with you, Elfdude. :-)

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:07 pm
by ElfDude
Big Blue Owl wrote:
ElfDude wrote:
Big Blue Owl wrote:If the Doors played Stairway To Heaven

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW8jVHTC ... re=related
Definitely a testament to how much better The Beatles were than The Doors
The difference may be the introduction to drugs. When the Beatles had this original hit of theirs that was used as the backdrop music for this tune, they hadn't been introduced to the width and breadth of the drug culture that The Doors had by the time their "used for Stairway" song was written. That may (and may not) explain the "betterness" of the Beatles version than the Doors version, but whatever the actual truth, I agree with you, Elfdude. :-)
I know we're comparing apples to onions. But the Beatles were just SO much better... :-D

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:20 pm
by Big Blue Owl
Yes! Just basically, inherently better.
The band who portrayed the Beatles in the video were very cool. Very close, eh?

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:14 pm
by ElfDude
Big Blue Owl wrote:Yes! Just basically, inherently better.
The band who portrayed the Beatles in the video were very cool. Very close, eh?
I've thoroughly enjoyed every Beatles tribute band I've seen too. :)

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:28 pm
by Walkinghairball
I still don't really like either of them, but no biggie.



I don't discount what either did for today's music.

Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:51 pm
by awip2062

Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:00 pm
by Sir Myghin

Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 10:20 am
by ElfDude

Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 9:13 am
by Big Blue Owl
Alex Lifeson interviews Primus as "Big Al" with horrid fake teeth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuSbzTqD4LI

Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:24 am
by Kares4Rush
Big Blue Owl wrote:Alex Lifeson interviews Primus as "Big Al" with horrid fake teeth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuSbzTqD4LI
OMG that is SO funny!!! :lol: