Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 8:51 am
My father and I deduced that it may have had something to do with the freezing cold temperatures, rain, then freezing rain, then snow on Sunday night- it was just brutal out.
It's all about the Rush
https://www.by-tor.com/forums/
Walkinghairball wrote:Loser cruisers are the scourge of the automobile world eh Soup? That's why we have had 2 of them.
Point taken- but I will say that Blue (yes, that's her name) has been a tank up until last month- it's just a minor hiccup though.Soup4Rush wrote:coming from the owner of a Taurus?
YYZ30 wrote:Walkinghairball wrote:Loser cruisers are the scourge of the automobile world eh Soup? That's why we have had 2 of them.
FTFY
Merry Christmas!!!!
*runs like hell*
Ya know what? He is SO right! Did I need to know that he ordered a tuna melt on 12-grain bread? No. Do I need pictures of his family at a water park? NO!HONOLULU ? The media glare, the constant security appendage and the sheer production that has become a morning jog or a hankering for an ice cream cone ? it?s been closing in on Barack Obama for some time.
Now the president-elect appears increasingly conscious of the confines of his new position, bristling at the routine demands of press coverage and beginning to chafe at boundaries that are only going to get smaller.
Obama even took the unusual step Friday morning of leaving behind the pool of reporters assigned to follow him, taking his daughters to a nearby water park without them. It was a breach of longstanding protocol between presidents (or presidents-elect) and the media, that a gaggle of reporters representing television, print and wire services is with his motorcade at all times.
Then when reporters finally caught up with Obama at Koko Marina Paradise Deli and he acknowledged them for one of few times since arriving in Hawaii last Saturday, he sounded resigned.
After ordering a tuna melt on 12-grain bread, Obama approached reporters and placed his hand on the shoulder of pool reporter Philip Rucker of The Washington Post, who was scribbling away in his notebook.
?You don't really need to write all that down,? Obama said.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/flight93_memorialFlight 93 families ask Bush to OK land seizure
Seize land? Hey, I'm all for a memorial to the Flight 93 heroes, but...should we really seize land for it? I mean, doesn't that go against the grain of the freedom that the nation those heroes died defending gives us? "If you won't give us the land we want at the price we want, we'll just take it anyway?"PHILADELPHIA ? Relatives of those who died aboard United Airlines Flight 93 want the Bush Administration to seize the land needed for a memorial where the plane crashed in Shanksville, Pa., in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
The Families of Flight 93 sent a letter earlier this month asking President George W. Bush to empower the Secretary of the Interior to take the land in dispute from a homeowner who had been in negotiations with the National Parks Service, said Patrick White, vice president of the families' organization.
The group says ground must be broken early next year in time for a memorial to be build for the 10th anniversary of the crash in 2011.
Svonavec Inc. owns one of the last large chunks of land needed for the 2,200-acre memorial, including the area where the plane crashed Sept. 11, 2001.
Would think so, but I don't know for sure.awip2062 wrote:Shouldn't a person be allowed not to sell, even if someone else wants it badly? Even if something historic happened there?