Page 41 of 402

Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:37 pm
by zepboy
bars

Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:38 pm
by schuette
cars

Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:19 pm
by PV
card

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 3:38 am
by schuette
bard

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:03 am
by Big Blue Owl
Bald

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:38 am
by Fridge
Balm

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:59 am
by CygnusX1
Bail

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:21 am
by Big Blue Owl
*Ehhhhht!*

Cyg will be the first to try out Schu's new "Electrodes to the Balls" punishment for an incorrect entry. Would you like a blindfold and a cigarette?

---------------

Palm


---------------

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:34 am
by CygnusX1
Big Blue Owl wrote:*Ehhhhht!*

Cyg will be the first to try out Schu's new "Electrodes to the Balls" punishment for an incorrect entry. Would you like a blindfold and a cigarette?

---------------

Palm


---------------
*excuse me for inturrupting the current to my juevos, but I changed a LETTER - and someone forgot I'm a electrician. :-D

*Hey Schu....can you crank that up a bit? Theryago....Nice.*

*Game on*

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:42 am
by Big Blue Owl
Damn! Then that's not a fitting punishment! For changing two letters you should have both of your eyes (I's) dotted :-D


-------

Calm

-------

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:47 am
by awip2062
Looks to me like we need to define our terms a bit more so we have unity.

I think this is the way each of you are seeing it:

Siggs took out the "i" and added an "m" to the end, so he figures he didn't change more than one letter.

BBO figures that since the "l" was in the third position but got moved by Siggs to the fourth, Siggs changed two letters.

Who's right? Who's wrong?

I think that Siggs followed the letter of the law with his word.

I also think I am analyzing this WAY too much.

*crosses her t and heads off to find java*

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:51 am
by CygnusX1
awip2062 wrote:Looks to me like we need to define our terms a bit more so we have unity.

I think this is the way each of you are seeing it:

Siggs took out the "i" and added an "m" to the end, so he figures he didn't change more than one letter.

BBO figures that since the "l" was in the third position but got moved by Siggs to the fourth, Siggs changed two letters.

Who's right? Who's wrong?

I think that Siggs followed the letter of the law with his word.

I also think I am analyzing this WAY too much.

*crosses her t and heads off to find java*
*WOW! I think we hit a stalemate! Ever had that happen before?*

*Gotta hand out mad props to Owlie though...He plays well.*

*game ON.*

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:38 pm
by schuette
The next person may change only one letter in the word to make a new word.


cygs...you were in the wrong......it doesnt say you may change one letter and move another to a different position :razz: :-D

balm

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:48 pm
by CygnusX1
schuette wrote:
The next person may change only one letter in the word to make a new word.


cygs...you were in the wrong......it doesnt say you may change one letter and move another to a different position :razz: :-D

balm
*DOES-IT-NAAAW???* LOL

calm

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:53 pm
by schuette
and then you immediately say the word that I changed into balm with :lol:

I'll go back to balm :-D