By-Tor.com

This should make reasonable people squirm:

Oh yeah, I forgot to tell you - this passed the House already.

SURPRISE!

Keep that in mind when you read the WND story below.

I call it: The Obama Youth

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php? ... geId=92288

H/T to runforron


Congratulations! We're all terrorists now!

Posted March 12th, 2009
by runforron

Secret State Police Report: Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin,
Libertarians are Terrorists

Alex Jones has received a secret report distributed by the Missouri
Information Analysis Center (MIAC) entitled ?The Modern Militia
Movement? and dated February 20, 2009.

A footer on the document indicates it is ?unclassified? but ?law
enforcement sensitive,? in other words, not for public consumption.

A copy of the report was sent to Jones by an anonymous Missouri police
officer.

The MIAC report specifically describes supporters of presidential
candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr as ?militia?-influenced
terrorists, and instructs the Missouri police to be on the lookout for
supporters displaying bumper stickers and other paraphernalia
associated with the Constitutional, Campaign for Liberty, and Libertarian
parties.

http://www.infowars.com/s...

Check out the link ^^ Pretty scary stuff.

If you haven't changed the minds of your friends and family, now's the
time to start looking over your shoulder.

That article sounds like a fear paper to me. But, I like the idea of a manditory time in the military for the youngsters of today. It would be an eye opener to the little bastard ones that act like the world owes them something. Maybe, just maybe we will see one of them snot nosed punks say, "Sir, Ma'am" for a damn change and be a hell of a lot more proper. Nix this MTV raps generation off the map. Yes, I like the manditory dicipline factor associated with this idea......A LOT!!!!!!!!

Yes I realize not all of today's youth is like that, but the good ones are not the issue.

Unfortunately, if the girls get a free pass if they are knocked up, that will be their colossal loophole there.

Walkinghairball wrote:That article sounds like a fear paper to me. But, I like the idea of a manditory time in the military for the youngsters of today. It would be an eye opener to the little bastard ones that act like the world owes them something. Maybe, just maybe we will see one of them snot nosed punks say, "Sir, Ma'am" for a damn change and be a hell of a lot more proper. Nix this MTV raps generation off the map. Yes, I like the manditory dicipline factor associated with this idea......A LOT!!!!!!!!

Yes I realize not all of today's youth is like that, but the good ones are not the issue.

Unfortunately, if the girls get a free pass if they are knocked up, that will be their colossal loophole there.

Bro, Hitler did the same thing. He called it the Hitler Youth.

Read between the lines. There's more to it then just community service.

Did you see "Security Force" mentioned in the text?

Jus' sayin.'

Form your own opinions. I'm just the humble messenger.

I read it, and I think it is mostly fear.


Yeah, there is a Hitler Youth possibility to any kind of manditory service thing, but I don't think that is the case.

My 2 copper discs.

I'm just glad that there is a convenient figurehead that the frustrated, nearly panicked Republicans, or Righties, or Freepers, or whatever you want to call Obama-haters can blame all of their woes upon.
You're welcome.

Walkinghairball wrote:I read it, and I think it is mostly fear.


Yeah, there is a Hitler Youth possibility to any kind of manditory service thing, but I don't think that is the case.

My 2 copper discs.

Roger that.

I'm glad Obama backed off of the brainfart of making wounded warriors
get private insurance to pay for duty-connected injuries.

That was the right thing to do. They should know better than than to f**k
with combat-wounded veterans.

(I'll bet Murtha had a hand in that bullshit. )

Like I mentioned to Zed - when you take the oath to defend the
Constitution of the United States, it doesn't come with a expiration date.

(Hope you're reading this, Nancy Pelosi. You took it too.)

CygnusX1 wrote:

Walkinghairball wrote:I read it, and I think it is mostly fear.


Yeah, there is a Hitler Youth possibility to any kind of manditory service thing, but I don't think that is the case.

My 2 copper discs.

Roger that.

I'm glad Obama backed off of the brainfart of making wounded warriors
get private insurance to pay for duty-connected injuries.

That was the right thing to do. They should know better than than to f**k
with combat-wounded veterans.

(I'll bet Murtha had a hand in that bullshit. )

Like I mentioned to Zed - when you take the oath to defend the
Constitution of the United States, it doesn't come with a expiration date.

I'll say it again. He didn't back off of that. He was presented an idea by the people that present ideas to him for consideration, and some large-mouthed basshole ran off like a town crier saying that he was thinking of doing this horrible thing to our veterans. It'll happen again next week. Some idiot will hear something negative and shout it from the mountains. It will cause a right-wing panic, be proven to have been bullshit by the third day and we'll be on to the next absurdity.
Having said all of that I don't expect a word of it to be considered or even remembered by the next false alarm.

Big Blue Owl wrote:

CygnusX1 wrote:

Walkinghairball wrote:I read it, and I think it is mostly fear.


Yeah, there is a Hitler Youth possibility to any kind of manditory service thing, but I don't think that is the case.

My 2 copper discs.

Roger that.

I'm glad Obama backed off of the brainfart of making wounded warriors
get private insurance to pay for duty-connected injuries.

That was the right thing to do. They should know better than than to f**k
with combat-wounded veterans.

(I'll bet Murtha had a hand in that bullshit. )

Like I mentioned to Zed - when you take the oath to defend the
Constitution of the United States, it doesn't come with a expiration date.

I'll say it again. He didn't back off of that. He was presented an idea by the people that present ideas to him for consideration, and some large-mouthed basshole ran off like a town crier saying that he was thinking of doing this horrible thing to our veterans. It'll happen again next week. Some idiot will hear something negative and shout it from the mountains. It will cause a right-wing panic, be proven to have been bullshit by the third day and we'll be on to the next absurdity.
Having said all of that I don't expect a word of it to be considered or even remembered by the next false alarm.

I believe you Owlie, but it was presented to him. It happened.

Therefore, it's a fact - and uncool on every level imaginable.

Agree?

I don't agree. Every possible level? If all of the ideas in the world were good ones we would have nothing to disagree about and would live in ice cream castles with chocolate sprinkle roofs. What is good about it is Obama's ability to see a very bad idea, give it due consideration and make an intelligent, considerate decision on it. This should be seen as proof that he chooses correctly and doesn't go to the media crying that everyone was freaking out about nothing, saying/printing things like,

"Obama Administration Has Plan to Make Veterans Pay for Health Care" (Media lie) and "It's too bad stupidity isn't an impeachable offense." and "Although the above story is nauseating in its revelation (although, for
some reason, unsurprising) of the Obama Administration's disdain for
American veterans, what is truly sickening is that Veterans Affairs
Secretary Eric Shinseki, a retired U.S. Army four-star general, would
have listened to such a proposal without threatening to resign if it was
ever mentioned again in his presence!

In my opinion, Shinseki has lost any claim that he may have had to the
respect of his fellow veterans because he is obviously more concerned
with his desire for power and political influence than the wellbeing of
those that served under him, as well little concern for those that have
served in past wars.

As to the Obama Administration's obvious slight problem with honesty, I
think the following news item, from the BostonGlobe.com web site, says
it all:

March 12, 2009

Ft. Bragg, N.C.

"Michelle Obama, who has declared supporting military families as one of
her signature issues as first lady, is stressing that issue in her first out-of-
town trip."

---------------------------------------
Michelle Obama made her first trip to Fort Bragg to visit the troops and their children. How about, "Wow, that is cool." instead of "the Obama Administration's obvious slight problem with honesty?"

So, I can't agree with just going nuts and posting all of this negative stuff because you read something on a right-wing Obama-opposing media (when it is reactionary and ultimately untrue.) Yes, it is a fact that a bad idea was presented to our Pres. It is another fact that he doesn't just okay everything that is sat in front of him. We are very lucky for that.

Fair enough then.

My 50 million brothers and sisters will remain cautiously vigilant
until demonstrated otherwise to stand down.

Semper Fi.

Dude, what are you talking about?

My 50 million brothers and sisters will remain cautiously vigilant
until demonstrated otherwise to stand down.

Nobody is against the military or veterans. My own Dad was both. There is nothing to remain vigilant about or to stand down from.

Love your saluting spirit, though. I'd want to be on your team in a conflict. But we don't have one in this instance.

There IS something to be vigilant about . . . a President who bowls like he's in the Special Olympics!

zepboy wrote:There IS something to be vigilant about . . . a President who bowls like he's in the Special Olympics!

That was hilarious! I love that sort of humor.

Watch the entire interview here;

http://www.nbc.com/The_Tonight_Show_wit ... 9/1067541/

If is so great to be able to be represented by, depend on and rise up to support a man such as this. I mean, I can hardly believe our good judgment! Nice going, nation.

*hangs his head at the lack of Presidential decorum*