Is Global Warming a Sin?

Open discussion about the world we live in today. Topics in here can get heated, but please keep it civil.

Moderator: Priests of Syrinx

User avatar
Xanadu
Posts: 7878
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 5:26 pm
Location: My vortex.

Post by Xanadu »

Have any of you looked at images of the US on google earth? Notice just how much of what was once natural land IS NOW FARMLAND AND SUBURBS? Look at the rest of the world...now tell me this is not significantly effecting our atmosphere and oceans! :shock:
We're all mad here!
User avatar
ElfDude
Posts: 11085
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 1:19 pm
Location: In the shadows of the everlasting hills
Contact:

Post by ElfDude »

Xanadu wrote:Have any of you looked at images of the US on google earth? Notice just how much of what was once natural land IS NOW FARMLAND AND SUBURBS? Look at the rest of the world...now tell me this is not significantly effecting our atmosphere and oceans! :shock:
You're opposed to farms?
Aren't you the guy who hit me in the eye?
Image
User avatar
Wendy
Posts: 1557
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Astral Plane of Happiness

Post by Wendy »

I look at google earth all the time, tried to search for Steve Fossett
at one time. Too bad they never found him. The planet is looking less
natural rapidly.

"Factory" farms are detrimental, read Jane Goodall's "Harvest for Hope"
to learn why. "Sustainable" farming is preferable and should be the way of the future.

Global warming, imho, is not only caused by greenhouse effect.
It is a combo of many different forces aligning at the same time
causing visible disastrous effects.

A sin?, well, yes.
Sound verbalized tones touch textured feel scent wafted aroma see visualize observe sing dance live
User avatar
Mr. Potatoe Head
Posts: 1783
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 6:25 am

Post by Mr. Potatoe Head »

Did you know they crossed a French Bulldog with a Shitzoo it's called Bullshit! Just getting off the subject for a giggle.

Elfdude are you being stupid or just want to be an ass? Your taking Xanny's reply and turning it into your own agenda.

I am not opposed to farms just, herbicides, fungicide, pesticides, strychinine, steriods and on and on.
Last edited by Mr. Potatoe Head on Tue Nov 06, 2007 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ElfDude
Posts: 11085
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 1:19 pm
Location: In the shadows of the everlasting hills
Contact:

Post by ElfDude »

Mr. Potatoe Head wrote: Elfdude are you being stupid or just want to be an ass?
If you look through the threads in here where man-made global warming has been discussed, you will find that I have done my best (most of the time at least) to make my posts based in science and in fact. Your posts, on the other hand, are generally based on emotion and melodrama, sometimes with a little bit of anecdotal climate information thrown in.

But at the same time, you ciriticize me because I believe in God.

In this discussion, which one of us is acting like the religious zealot and which is basing his argument on science?
Aren't you the guy who hit me in the eye?
Image
User avatar
Mr. Potatoe Head
Posts: 1783
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 6:25 am

Post by Mr. Potatoe Head »

Hey' wait just one min. here!
I didn't criticize you for believing in God.
I criticized you for being a wise ass with your reply, to Xanny's reply.
You have a tendency to put words into peoples mouths too.
User avatar
Wendy
Posts: 1557
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Astral Plane of Happiness

Post by Wendy »

Tuesdays so just bring out the very best in everyone don't they because it's such a long damn time til week's end eh?. :smt065 :smt027 :smt011
Sound verbalized tones touch textured feel scent wafted aroma see visualize observe sing dance live
User avatar
ElfDude
Posts: 11085
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 1:19 pm
Location: In the shadows of the everlasting hills
Contact:

Post by ElfDude »

Mr. Potatoe Head wrote: I criticized you for being a wise ass with your reply, to Xanny's reply.
What was wise-ass in my reply? It was a simple question. I had never heard of someone opposed to farmland (ranches, yes, but not farmland or farms). That was completely new to me. So I asked, "You're opposed to farms?" No name calling. No shocked-looking or eye-rolling emoticons. A plain question. And I get called either stupid or an ass for it.
Aren't you the guy who hit me in the eye?
Image
User avatar
Mr. Potatoe Head
Posts: 1783
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 6:25 am

Post by Mr. Potatoe Head »

I must have a bit of an evil streak in me because I can't get this silly grin off my face.
User avatar
Walkinghairball
Posts: 25037
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:42 pm
Location: In a rock an roll venue near you....as long as you are in the Pacific Northwest.

Post by Walkinghairball »

So are we all ok now, or what?
This space for rent
User avatar
awip2062
Posts: 25518
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:15 am
Contact:

Post by awip2062 »

Big Blue Owl wrote:
it is quite logical for Him to be in the science, indeed every, classroom.
But every child/person has to go to school and not all school people (and parents) are Christians (and/or religious.) How, then, do we have God in all classrooms when some or even half or more don't have/need/want him in their lives?
My History teacher taught that one of the top reasons for leaving old home lands and coming to the new world was to seek religious freedom. In every class seems like forcing everyone to accept one theology/theory.

I'm not trying to be snarky or argumentative, and I realize we're just talking about individual beliefs. I'm just kinda wondering what your thoughts are. :-)
I don't see you as being snarky or argumentative; we are just discussing, aye?

:D

I have mostly Navajo in me, but I am also descended from Edward Winslow, someone who lived in Plymouth Plantation. He suffered greatly so I could be and have that which he only dreamt of being and having. I agree with your history teacher, and I value, greatly, religious freedom.

That said, I don't think that all classes in all schools must have the religious taught. I attended a non-denominational Christian school from second week of K through jr. high and then I attended various public schools for sr. high as we moved about the country. That kind of freedom is what I want in our country. And not just non-denominational Christian schools in which all classes have the religious taught, but denominational Christian, Muslim, and Hindu and Buddhist, and Dyanetic, and whatever other religion wishes to raise their children with their beliefs and whoever wants to raise their children without a specific religious training should have schools that don't put any one faith forward.

I will say, however, that not all children must attend school. There are laws (laws I am VERY grateful for) that allow parents to keep their children home and educate them.

So, I guess my comment
it is quite logical for Him to be in the science, indeed every, classroom.
should be qualified to say that, for those who believe this, it should be allowed, not condemned outright. Otherwise, what do we have? We have a system that says only the beliefs of some may be taught. Acks!
Onward and Upward!
User avatar
Mr. Potatoe Head
Posts: 1783
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 6:25 am

Post by Mr. Potatoe Head »

Only absolute fact should be taught in schools and truefully so.
User avatar
awip2062
Posts: 25518
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:15 am
Contact:

Post by awip2062 »

Well, there's a problem with that.

Who decides what absolute fact is? You, or me?
Onward and Upward!
User avatar
Big Blue Owl
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Somewhere between the darkness and the light

Post by Big Blue Owl »

I'm beginning to see another important reason why home-schooling is an intelligent and freeing alternative.
(((((((((((((((all'a you)))))))))))))))
User avatar
awip2062
Posts: 25518
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:15 am
Contact:

Post by awip2062 »

Because you can wear boxers or go comando if you want and no one will see in the locker room? :?

*wink*
Onward and Upward!
Post Reply