No, they did not. I, just like you, had neither seen nor heard of these pictures till they were withdrawn.ElfDude wrote:Because a major news outlet tried to deceive you?Devil's Advocate wrote:Outrage? Reuters withdrew the pic. Why should I be outraged?CygnusX1 wrote:Well.....I'm waiting too....
WHERE'S THE OUTRAGE? CNN? BBC? NBC? DA?
I guess you have no takers Elfie....
Conflicts in the Middle East
Moderator: Priests of Syrinx
-
Devil's Advocate
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 2:42 pm
- Location: Pembs, Wales, UK
- Contact:
-
Devil's Advocate
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 2:42 pm
- Location: Pembs, Wales, UK
- Contact:
This O'Reilly?CygnusX1 wrote:Elfie....MY SAVIOR HAS ARRIVED!!!
Next to O'Reilly, if you American Rushians don't know who this guy is, you're already dead...hahaha
LET COMMON SENSE PREVAIL!!!
I hope not.
-
ElfDude
- Posts: 11085
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 1:19 pm
- Location: In the shadows of the everlasting hills
- Contact:
So... it's okay for a news agency to try to deceive the public so song as less than 100% of them are paying attention?Devil's Advocate wrote:No, they did not. I, just like you, had neither seen nor heard of these pictures till they were withdrawn.ElfDude wrote:Because a major news outlet tried to deceive you?Devil's Advocate wrote: Outrage? Reuters withdrew the pic. Why should I be outraged?
Aren't you the guy who hit me in the eye?
I don't see what the big deal is. After all, it was only "an overrepresentation of factual presentations."Devil's Advocate wrote:No, they did not. I, just like you, had neither seen nor heard of these pictures till they were withdrawn.ElfDude wrote:Because a major news outlet tried to deceive you?Devil's Advocate wrote: Outrage? Reuters withdrew the pic. Why should I be outraged?
Onward and Upward!
who DOESN'T scratch their head at him?Soup4Rush wrote:Bill O' Reilly was a bad example Sigs... He makes sense some times, but most times I scratch my head at what he says.
the point is, he literally NUKES a bullshitter...even the best-intentioned people spin...and O'Reilly slam-dunks 'em when they DO...
Don't start none...won't be none.
I couldn't open your link DA....damn...Devil's Advocate wrote:This O'Reilly?CygnusX1 wrote:Elfie....MY SAVIOR HAS ARRIVED!!!
Next to O'Reilly, if you American Rushians don't know who this guy is, you're already dead...hahaha
LET COMMON SENSE PREVAIL!!!
I hope not.
This is who spinners, deceivers and charlatans should fear:
http://www.foxnews.com/oreilly/index.html
Don't start none...won't be none.
eh, that's subject to interpretation Soups...
if by not letting him finish a sentence, then yes, Letterman DID rip him a new one...
the fact is, Letterman couldn't hold an serious, intelligent converstion with him to save his ass...it was all about the RATINGS dude...
additionally, you won't see Letterman on the "Factor"....that's just the way it is...turnabout is fair play, but Letterman cut-and-ran...
if by not letting him finish a sentence, then yes, Letterman DID rip him a new one...
the fact is, Letterman couldn't hold an serious, intelligent converstion with him to save his ass...it was all about the RATINGS dude...
additionally, you won't see Letterman on the "Factor"....that's just the way it is...turnabout is fair play, but Letterman cut-and-ran...
Don't start none...won't be none.
I gotta agree....the yuks came first that night, and the audience DID have a chuckle at Bill's expense....not to worry though...I'm still waiting for the night DL shows up on the "Factor", but I'm not holding my breath...
I mean, fair's fair right? huh? whaaat?
C'mon Dave....grow a pair and enter the NO SPIN ZONE....BWUHAHAHAHA
I mean, fair's fair right? huh? whaaat?
C'mon Dave....grow a pair and enter the NO SPIN ZONE....BWUHAHAHAHA
Don't start none...won't be none.