Today's Headlines

CygnusX1 · Post by **CygnusX1** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:07 am

Yeah, she's a half-whack-sabre-rattler, but I figured that the facts would
speak for themselves. They did.

I think this just opened a huge-ass can of worms, and we ain't heard
nothin' yet...

***Makes some popcorn for the fallout***

Big Blue Owl · Post by **Big Blue Owl** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:15 am

Someday this kind of vomit journalism will be an embarrassing part of the past.

The gist of the article is "See, Democrats are almost as bad as Republicans!" What a waste of flesh and bone...and cake hole!

CygnusX1 · Post by **CygnusX1** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:24 am

Big Blue Owl wrote: Someday this kind of vomit journalism will be an embarrassing part of the past.

Well, it's basically all they have left.

They spend 80% of the time
defending themselves anyway, but I agree 100%.

Big Blue Owl wrote: The gist of the article is "See, Democrats are almost as bad as Republicans!" What a waste of flesh and bone...and cake hole!

Whaddya mean almost? LMAO

Big Blue Owl · Post by **Big Blue Owl** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:25 am

CygnusX1 wrote:
Whaddya mean almost? LMAO

Ah, you caught that, did ya?

CygnusX1 · Post by **CygnusX1** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:32 am

Big Blue Owl wrote:
CygnusX1 wrote:
Whaddya mean almost? LMAO
Ah, you caught that, did ya?

Like the Vietnamese clap...

What do ya think? Is the Gov and the wife the only ones goin' down?

Big Blue Owl · Post by **Big Blue Owl** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:40 am

No, I'm sure I saw a video showing Malkin going down on a spider monkey.

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaam!

And isn't she in the infamous "two girls and a cup" video? Perhaps one should google it.

Walkinghairball · Post by **Walkinghairball** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:46 am

I do in all honesty hope this is untracable to Obama. This would not look good at all. For either side. If we are going to get 'r done, this would be the start of well................................I don't even want to think about it right now.

Big Blue Owl · Post by **Big Blue Owl** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:51 am

I agree. Of course it's difficult to see why B.O. would involve himself in this kind of dreck anyway, seeing as how he's rich and in the top position. So he doesn't need this idiot's chump change or political favors. It appears it's just this jerkwad and his horrible wife trying to "better" themselves by capitalizing on the senate vacancy.

I wish it was a sex scandal. Those are more fun

Walkinghairball · Post by **Walkinghairball** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:58 am

You know what bro, I was gonna make an "Oral Office" joke on this yesterday, but just forgot to do it. Oh wellski.

Looks like Gov. Rod Blagojevich will be an intern at the federal pen soon enough though.

awip2062 · Post by **awip2062** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:14 pm

CygnusX1 wrote: (He discussed
his trading scheme with an unnamed "SEIU (Service Employees
International Union) official" and unnamed "various consultants" in
Washington.).....
And it was the year of multimillion-dollar
embezzlement scandals at Democratic satellite offices of ACORN and the
SEIU.

Oh great, my union is just so......*sigh*

zepboy · Post by **zepboy** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:39 pm

I just heard that the Pittsburg School District in Pennsylvania has proposed a new policy that would make 50 % the lowest score a student can get, even if they do not work at all.

The rationale is that this will allow students with very poor performance to restore their GPA to somewhat acceptable standards.

Gee, won't Johnny feel good about himself!

awip2062 · Post by **awip2062** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:55 pm

That's not restoring a GPA...that's lying.

zepboy · Post by **zepboy** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:58 pm

No, if that's the rule, then it's NOT lying. We live according to relative standards in a secular society. Therefore, if the establishment endorses it, then it is not wrong, and therefore cannot be lying.

awip2062 · Post by **awip2062** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:08 pm

2+2 IS 4 no matter what the "rules" are.

If you do no work or if you get more than half the answers wrong, you do not get 50% on your work.

Changing the definition of something does not change what that something really is.

What is the meaning of "is"?

zepboy · Post by **zepboy** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:24 pm

well, if the shoe doesn't fit, then one changes shoes. Isn't that essentially what they are doing?

Do you expect them to get different feet?

Face it. When people don't like the results, they changes the rules. Few are those remaining in our world who will do the hard work to see something through. Rather, most would just change situational rules rather than change themselves.